MULTI-LAYER INTERPRETATION
Magnetic patterns become more useful when their geometry and geological context are tested against genuinely independent evidence.
EVIDENCE 01
Magnetic intensity, reduced-to-pole response, gradients and other derivatives help identify domains, contacts, lineaments and source-scale features. Agreement among derivatives tests stability, not mineral identity.
EVIDENCE 02
Mapped lithology and structure frame plausible mineral systems. Gravity adds a density-sensitive line of evidence at its actual resolution. Terrain provides context for coverage and access; a DEM is not direct evidence of chromite.
EVIDENCE 03
Collars, logs, assays and known occurrences can calibrate or challenge a hypothesis. A nearby point on a map is context; it does not prove that a target was tested or that the same mineralization extends into it.
EVIDENCE 04
Intrusions, dikes, remanence and other lithologies can resemble a desired target response. The interpretation records alternatives and proposes measurements that would separate them.
The figures above are preliminary public-data examples, not mineral-resource estimates or drilling instructions.