MULTI-LAYER INTERPRETATION

A stronger target needs more than one compelling map

Magnetic patterns become more useful when their geometry and geological context are tested against genuinely independent evidence.

EVIDENCE 01

Magnetics and derivatives

Magnetic intensity, reduced-to-pole response, gradients and other derivatives help identify domains, contacts, lineaments and source-scale features. Agreement among derivatives tests stability, not mineral identity.

Figure 1. Residual magnetic intensity and survey footprint. Source: Ring of Fire interpretation report, reviewer revision, 28 September 2026. Preliminary interpretation.
Figure 22. Geological and structural context. Source: Ring of Fire interpretation report, reviewer revision, 28 September 2026. Preliminary interpretation.

EVIDENCE 02

Geology, gravity and terrain

Mapped lithology and structure frame plausible mineral systems. Gravity adds a density-sensitive line of evidence at its actual resolution. Terrain provides context for coverage and access; a DEM is not direct evidence of chromite.

EVIDENCE 03

Drilling and occurrences

Collars, logs, assays and known occurrences can calibrate or challenge a hypothesis. A nearby point on a map is context; it does not prove that a target was tested or that the same mineralization extends into it.

Figure 24. Drilling and mineral-occurrence context. Source: Ring of Fire interpretation report, reviewer revision, 28 September 2026. Preliminary interpretation.
Figure 25. Gravity and gravity-gradient products — Vertical gravity EQS. Source: Ring of Fire interpretation report, reviewer revision, 28 September 2026. Preliminary interpretation.

EVIDENCE 04

Competing explanations

Intrusions, dikes, remanence and other lithologies can resemble a desired target response. The interpretation records alternatives and proposes measurements that would separate them.

What the team can use

  • Cross-check independent evidence families
  • Keep provenance and resolution visible
  • Explain what could change the ranking

Discuss the evidence with us

The figures above are preliminary public-data examples, not mineral-resource estimates or drilling instructions.